Back to blog

Why AI-generated slides look generic, and how to fix yours

AI-generated slides look generic because the tool fills in what you left out. Five changes, before and after you generate, that make the deck about your case.

by Ana Monterroca, Content Lead··6 min read

You ask an AI tool for a quarterly business review (QBR) and a minute later you have twelve tidy slides with clean alignment and no typos. Then you read them and realize they could belong to any company. This post explains where that generic feel comes from and walks through five specific changes, some before you generate and some after, that turn the draft into something only you could present.

Where the generic feel comes from

Several tools can now build a deck from a single request. Copilot in PowerPoint creates slides from your instructions, the ChatGPT add-in for PowerPoint drafts a deck from your source material, Claude can produce PowerPoint files, and Gamma turns a topic into a structured draft. What this post describes can show up with any of them, because it depends mostly on what they’re given.

When the whole request is “make me a QBR deck”, the tool has no idea who is in the room, what they need to decide, or what your numbers are. Without those details, it falls back on the usual shape of a QBR, with a title slide, an agenda, “Overview”, “Key Metrics”, “Next Steps”, “Thank You”.

The vendors say as much in their own help pages. Microsoft reminds you that Copilot only knows your current conversation and asks you to give it lots of detail, and its guide to templates warns that when your template doesn’t give Copilot enough to go on, it may generate generic layouts.

You can usually spot the result in four places:

  • Headlines that name a topic. “Q3 Sales” tells the reader nothing. “Two new accounts drove most of Q3’s growth” tells them what happened.
  • Bullets that fit anywhere. “Drive operational excellence” and “deepen customer relationships” could go into any company’s deck, in any industry, in any year.
  • Numbers with no source. If you didn’t supply data, the tool leaves it out, fills in a placeholder, or writes a figure that looks right and came from nowhere.
  • The default look. Stock theme, filler icons and decorative photos that show nothing about your business.

All four are fixed mostly by changing what you give the tool, and what you do with the draft it hands back.

Five changes that make the draft yours

1. Write a brief

The biggest gain comes before you generate anything. Describe the situation instead of naming the subject. Compare these two requests:

Make a presentation about our Q3 results.

Build an eight-slide deck for our VP of Sales and the CFO. It’s a 20-minute meeting and it needs to end with a decision: whether to fund two more account executives for the Midwest. Here’s the data. Q3 revenue was $2.4M, up 6% over Q2, and 70% of that growth came from two new accounts in Chicago. Keep the tone direct. End on the question they need to answer.

The second one is longer because every sentence takes a guess away from the tool. A useful brief answers five questions: who it’s for, what should happen at the end of the meeting, what data you have, how long you have, and what tone to use.

2. Ask for the outline first

Before you ask for slides, ask for the list of headlines. Fixing an eight-line outline is far easier than fixing eight finished slides. Check that the order tells a story, that no two slides say the same thing, and that every slide has a reason to be there. Once the outline holds up, ask for the content. The help page for the ChatGPT add-in for PowerPoint gives the same advice for larger edits, ask for a plan first.

3. Make every headline state the takeaway

Here’s the test. Read only the headlines, in order, as if they were a paragraph. If you come away knowing what happened and what’s being asked, the deck works. If what you read is “Overview, Background, Results, Risks, Next Steps”, you have a table of contents and the argument is still missing.

You can ask the tool for this directly: “rewrite every headline as a full sentence that states the slide’s conclusion.” Then check its work, because it will sometimes turn “Sales” into “Sales Analysis”, which still says nothing.

4. Give it your data, then check every number

Paste your numbers into the request, or attach the file they come from if the tool supports it. Before you present, go through every figure in the draft and confirm it exists in your source. A number you can’t trace doesn’t go in, however good it looks.

The vendors ask for the same thing. OpenAI’s help page for the ChatGPT add-in for PowerPoint tells you to review claims and numbers before sharing the deck, Anthropic notes that Claude can occasionally give incorrect or misleading answers, and Microsoft asks you to verify facts, figures, names and dates in Copilot’s output against your source material.

5. Run the logo test

Cover your company’s name and logo. If the deck could belong to a competitor, it’s still generic. Find the lines that would survive the swap and replace them with something only you could say: the customer’s name, the date of the commitment, the exact figure, the person who owns it. The same rule applies to images, so if a photo shows nothing about your business and is only there to decorate, cut it.

An example that isn’t generic

Here’s an example we wrote ourselves, a monthly business review for a fictional fulfillment company. The numbers are made up, but the structure is the part worth copying. The card links to the plain-text file the deck is built from, which reads almost like a document.

Meridian Fulfillment — Monthly Business Review

A monthly ops review for a fulfillment SaaS: revenue and SLA trend, a department scorecard, and next month's commitments.

Look at three things. The first content slide, “The Month in Five Lines”, sums up the month before any detail, so someone who reads only that slide already knows what matters. The other headlines stay the same every month on purpose, because this is a recurring review and leadership knows where to look for each thing, so the takeaway goes in the first line of the slides that need one. The wins slide opens with “Warehouse #3 hit full capacity two weeks ahead of plan”, and the risks slide with “Support first-response time is at 6.1 hours against a 4-hour target”. And the deck closes with “Questions for Leadership”, two concrete decisions for the people in the room, where a generic deck would put a “Thank you” slide.

What made those choices possible was knowing, before starting, what had to come out of that meeting.

Where SlideWeave fits

In SlideWeave you describe the presentation and get a first draft you can edit in a visual editor, without writing any code. Everything in this post applies there too, because a better brief gets you a better first draft and the headlines, the numbers and the logo test are still your job. You can start free, no card required.

Related posts